Endorsing Ned Lamont

In response to the unfortunate situation I found myself in last week in which I felt unable to refuse to sign the Lieberman as Independent petition last week, I’ve decided to use my blog here to quite enthusiastically endorse Ned Lamont.

I’ve had my reasons over the years to dislike Good Ol’ Joe. We just don’t agree on most things. His witchhunt for media he felt was corrupting our children. His assertion during the height of the Terri Schiavo mess that government should get a say in such personal matters. The war. The war, the war, the war.

Always humming underneath those more pressing issues has been his inability to just accept defeat. He’s always gotta have a back-up plan. When he was Gore’s running mate, it was his trusty Senate seat. Now that he’s in a forced primary for that Senate seat, it’s … his trusty Senate seat, but this time with a scarlet “I” on his chest.

He’s a political whore that needs to keep his options open, rather than settling down with one role. If he got VP, it would have been “See ya, Nutmeggers!” but since he didn’t get VP, the state was all too happy to welcome him back like a litter of kicked puppies hoping that maybe, maybe, maybe this time master would let them sleep in the house. Now, if he doesn’t get the democratic nom, he’ll just run in the back door as an independent and split the vote. That bastard is going to split the vote. If he truly cared about the direction of this state, and the democratic stake in the Senate, he’d let the chips fall where they may.

Joe, if the chips hustle your ass into political obsolescence, the Joementum yourself to the shuffleboard court. More than your political prostitution and your cuddly Republican-in-sheep’s-clothing stances, you’re trying to cheat this state the chance at fresh blood it deserves.

5 Responses

  1. Burgundy Books Says:

    Meet Ned Lamont at Burgundy Books of East Haddam on Tuesday, August 1, 6:30 pm

  2. Ashley Says:

    What really bothers me about the whole double-run issue is that people constantly forget that, had Gore/Lieberman won, Rowland would’ve been able to appoint a Republican to Lieberman’s seat. But dear Holy Joe was willing to accept that loss on our behalf just to make sure he had a back-up salary in place. That’s pretty much the definition of party sell-out.

  3. Amanda Says:

    JOEMENTUM!!!!!

  4. Mother Says:

    Now I know why he’s not invited to the wedding.

  5. lgaumond Says:

    Well written! I still haven’t decided which way I’m voting but all the Ned Lamont-lovers who keep calling me to ask if they can count on my vote are aggrivating the hell out of me. I was leaning away from the Nedster, maybw I’ll have to take another look.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.